Sign in to Peak Brain Path
Sign in to access your courses, books, and progress tracker. New here? Signing in creates your account automatically.
Want to explore courses first?
Browse courses and booksSign in to access your courses, books, and progress tracker. New here? Signing in creates your account automatically.
Want to explore courses first?
Browse courses and booksModule 2
Chapter 2 · 2.5 h · 8 quiz items · pass at 80%
This module opens IQCB Domain II (Neuroscience), 15% of the exam and the largest single share after QEEG and EEG. It establishes the bioelectric origin of every later measurement: the dipole, summation, and the forward model are the physical basis of every map the candidate will read. The recruiting/augmenting and inhibition content goes beyond entry-level neurofeedback training to the depth the IQCB exam tests. The quiz proves the learner can trace the scalp signal to its cellular source.
Every z-score you will ever read on a brain map traces back to one physical fact: cortical neurons hold electrical charge across their membranes, and that charge moves when the cell is signaled. The quantitative pipeline that follows in later chapters, the montage, the artifact rejection, the Fourier transform, the database comparison, is all bookkeeping performed on a voltage that a population of cells generated by changing state together. If you do not know where that voltage comes from, you can run the software and still misread its output, because the commonest interpretive errors in QEEG are errors about the source.
This chapter is the source. It is deeper than the four-hour treatment a BCIA candidate gets, because the IQCB blueprint weights neuroscience at fifteen percent and gives it eight study hours, and because it tests vocabulary the shorter track skips: the named types of neuronal interaction (synchronization, recruiting and augmenting responses), the named types of inhibition (recurrent, presynaptic), and the forward model that carries a dendritic current to a scalp electrode. If you completed Neurophysiology for Neurofeedback, treat the first half as review and slow down at the recruiting-response and inhibition sections, which that book condenses and this one does not.
One correction governs everything that follows. Scalp EEG does not record neurons firing. It records something slower, and almost every error a candidate makes on the exam, and a practitioner makes at the map, begins by forgetting that.
A neuron holds the inside of itself electrically negative relative to the outside, by roughly seventy thousandths of a volt, and it spends metabolic energy without pause to maintain that difference. This is the resting membrane potential, and it is the stored energy that every electrical event in the brain draws on. Carry the image of a small, leaky, rechargeable battery: charged, leaking through an imperfect membrane, and paying ATP continuously to stay charged.
The charge separation comes from ions and the proteins that move them. Sodium and chloride sit concentrated outside the cell; potassium and large negatively charged proteins sit inside. Each ion feels two forces at once. The concentration gradient pushes a crowded ion toward where it is sparse, the way a drop of dye spreads through still water. The electrical gradient pushes a charged ion according to the voltage it sits in, since like charges repel and opposites attract. For any single ion, equilibrium is the voltage at which these two forces cancel, the point of no net movement, and that balance point differs for each ion because each starts from a different concentration difference.
The resting voltage of the whole cell is not any one ion's balance point. It is a weighted average, pulled most strongly toward whichever ion the membrane lets through most easily. At rest the membrane is far more permeable to potassium than to sodium, so potassium does most of the work: it drifts outward down its concentration gradient, carries positive charge out, and the cell settles near the voltage where that outward push balances the inward electrical pull. A small inward sodium leak nudges the resting voltage slightly away from potassium's balance point. The Nernst equation gives the balance point for a single ion; the Goldman equation gives the weighted average across several. You do not compute either at the map, but the IQCB expects you to know that the resting potential is a permeability-weighted average and that potassium dominates it.
None of this holds for long without a pump. Left alone, the slow leak of sodium inward and potassium outward would erase the gradients, and the battery would run down. The sodium-potassium pump spends ATP to push sodium out and pull potassium in against their gradients, continuously, in billions of cells. This is a large part of why the brain is two percent of body weight and consumes on the order of twenty percent of the body's resting energy.
The battery has one immediate payoff for a QEEG practitioner. When the energy supply falters, through hypoxia, hypoglycemia, anesthesia, or a metabolic encephalopathy, the pumps cannot hold the gradients, the cells can no longer sustain fast desynchronized signaling, and the EEG slows and then suppresses. Diffuse slowing is the brain's low-battery warning, which is why a globally slow record points toward a metabolic or arousal cause rather than a focal one. You will meet that pattern again in Chapter 8 as the QEEG signature of encephalopathy. Its root is here, in the cost of staying charged.
A neuron makes two different electrical signals on two different timescales, and keeping them apart is the whole of this section.
The action potential is the fast one. When summed inputs push the membrane past a threshold near minus fifty-five millivolts, voltage-gated sodium channels snap open and sodium floods in. The key feature is positive feedback: the sodium that enters depolarizes the membrane further, which opens more sodium channels, which admits more sodium. That runaway is why the spike is all-or-none, full size or nothing, with no half-spike. The membrane shoots toward positive values, then the sodium channels inactivate and slower voltage-gated potassium channels open, driving the membrane back down past rest into a brief undershoot before it settles. The entire event lasts one to two milliseconds. A refractory period follows, during which the inactivated sodium channels cannot reopen, capping the maximum firing rate and forcing the spike to travel one way down the axon. Myelin lets the spike jump between gaps and conduct faster. Its loss, as in demyelinating disease, slows conduction.
The post-synaptic potential is the slow one. When an axon's signal reaches a synapse, calcium entry at the terminal makes vesicles fuse and spill neurotransmitter into the cleft, and the transmitter binds receptors on the receiving cell, which responds with a graded shift in membrane voltage. An excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP) nudges the cell toward threshold; an inhibitory one (IPSP) nudges it away. These shifts are graded, not all-or-none, their size scaling with the input, and they last tens to hundreds of milliseconds. Most importantly, they summate. Temporal summation is summation in time: one synapse firing rapidly, before each small potential decays, so the potentials stack. Spatial summation is summation in space: many synapses across the cell firing close together, their potentials adding because they overlap. The neuron is constantly performing both, integrating a barrage of excitation and inhibition into a moment-to-moment membrane voltage.
That word, summate, decides what the EEG can see. Two properties determine which electrical events reach the scalp: how long they last and how well they line up. Post-synaptic potentials win on both counts.
There is a consequence worth fixing early, because it underlies how you read every map. Because the EEG sums excitatory and inhibitory post-synaptic currents together, the trace reflects the net balance of excitation and inhibition in the tissue, not excitation alone. A quiet-looking stretch of EEG is not necessarily a quiet brain. It can be a brain in which excitation and inhibition are closely matched and largely canceling. Well-timed inhibition shapes when the net current swings, and the swing is what the electrode reads.
A post-synaptic potential does not leap instantly from synapse to trigger zone. It spreads along the dendrite passively, the way current spreads down a leaky cable, and it decays as it goes. This passive spread is electrotonic conduction, and it has a characteristic scale, the length constant (lambda): the distance over which a voltage change falls to about thirty-seven percent of its starting value. Beyond roughly two length constants, a potential has decayed to almost nothing. For a typical cortical dendrite the length constant runs a few hundred micrometers, while pyramidal-cell dendrites stretch one to two millimeters, so a synapse on a distal branch delivers a much-attenuated potential to the soma.
Two consequences follow for the scalp signal. Amplitude at the trigger zone depends not on raw distance but on how well the dendritic cable conducts: thick, well-sealed branches deliver a synapse's influence better than thin, leaky ones. And, more important for the EEG, slow potentials survive the cable far better than fast ones. A brief perturbation at a distal synapse decays before it travels far. A sustained, slowly-changing potential has time to spread along more of the dendritic tree, set up a current across a larger stretch of membrane, and contribute to the dipole the scalp can read. This is the dendritic basis of the chapter's thesis: the EEG records slow, sustained synaptic currents because only those currents fill the dendrite and establish the oriented current flow the next section calls a dipole.
A single neuron's electrical field is far too small to detect through cerebrospinal fluid, skull, and skin, yet QEEG records a clear, structured signal all day. The resolution to that paradox is the most important physical idea in the book, and it is entirely about shape and alignment.
The cortex is full of pyramidal cells, named for the triangular shape of their somata. Each has a long apical dendrite running from the cell body toward the cortical surface, roughly perpendicular to it, and a spread of basal dendrites near the body. The cell bodies sit mainly in layers III and V (Chapter 3 details the laminae), with the apical dendrites rising through the layers above toward layer I. This elongated, oriented shape is the feature that matters.
When a synaptic input arrives on one part of such a cell, current flows into the cell at that point and out at another, separated along the cell's length. The place where current enters is a sink; the place where it leaves is a source. A sink and a source separated in space form a current dipole: a pair of opposite charges, a tiny battery with a direction running from one pole to the other. An excitatory input on the apical dendrite, for example, draws current in up high (a superficial sink) and pushes it out lower down (a deep source), creating a dipole oriented along the dendrite. The polarity seen at the surface depends on where the synapse sits and whether it is excitatory or inhibitory: a superficial excitatory synapse and a deep inhibitory synapse can produce the same surface negativity, which is one reason a scalp polarity does not, by itself, tell you the sign of the underlying synapse.
One dipole is far too weak to matter. The signal exists because pyramidal cells are stacked in parallel, like trees in an orchard, all pointing the same way perpendicular to the cortical sheet, and because that alignment is enforced by the columnar organization of the cortex (Chapter 3). When a patch of them is active together, their individual dipoles point the same direction and add, producing a field large enough to conduct to the scalp. Neuroscientists call this an open-field arrangement, open because the summed field projects to a distance where an electrode can sense it. Populations with no consistent orientation produce closed fields that cancel at a distance, which is part of why scalp EEG is mostly blind to the thalamus, basal ganglia, and other deep nuclei, and to the cerebellum, whose tightly folded geometry cancels almost completely. The cortex, in effect, is an antenna built by the accident of its own architecture (Nunez & Srinivasan, 2006).
Only one cell type builds the EEG. The interneurons that surround the pyramidal cells shape the timing of pyramidal firing but contribute little directly to the surface field, because their shapes are compact and unaligned rather than long and parallel. When you read a scalp signal, you are reading the summed apical-dendrite currents of layer III and layer V pyramidal cells. Everything else in the sheet acts on those cells rather than adding its own voltage to the trace.
It takes a large patch of cortex to register. A scalp-detectable rhythm reflects the synchronous activity of something on the order of several square centimeters, millions of aligned pyramidal cells, not a handful and not a single column. This is why scalp QEEG is blind to small, isolated, or deep events that other methods see, and why a clear finding on a map is always a population statement rather than a single focus.
Alignment lets dipoles add in space. Synchrony lets them add in time. The amplitude of an EEG rhythm reflects how many aligned cells are oscillating together at the same moment. A cortex whose cells are each doing something different produces a small, busy, low-voltage signal, because the contributions partly cancel. A cortex whose cells have fallen into a common rhythm produces a large, slower, high-voltage signal, because the contributions reinforce. This is why a relaxed, idling occipital cortex throws a tall alpha rhythm while an engaged one flattens.
That single mechanism, synchrony seen through geometry, is the correct reading of EEG amplitude, and it overturns a natural but wrong inference. A burst of beta does not mean the neurons underneath are firing faster. It means a population of synaptic currents is oscillating in the beta range, synchronized and aligned enough to summate into a rhythm the electrode can pick up (Olejniczak, 2006). High amplitude is a synchrony measure, not an intensity-of-effort measure and not a firing-rate measure. When you see high-amplitude slow activity over a region on a power map, the geometry says the region is more likely idling or underengaged than working hard, because high amplitude is what a synchronized, idling cortex produces.
It surprises most newcomers that the dramatic event, the spike, is nearly invisible at the scalp while the quiet event, the synaptic shift, is what we record. There are two reasons, one about time and one about geometry.
The first is brevity and asynchrony. An action potential lasts a millisecond or two, and across a population the spikes fire at slightly different instants. For many tiny fields to add into one measurable field, they must overlap in time. Spikes this brief and this scattered do not overlap enough. Their fields point in different directions at any given moment and largely cancel. Add the steep voltage loss across cerebrospinal fluid, skull, and scalp, and the spike's contribution to the surface recording falls to almost nothing.
The second is the shape of the field a spike makes. As an action potential travels along the axon it creates a small moving region with current flowing in just ahead and out just behind. Those two opposing currents sit close together and cancel at any distance, the way the poles of a short bar magnet cancel when you step back. A field built from two nearly overlapping opposite sources is a closed field. It does not project. The sustained, spatially separated current of a post-synaptic potential does project, which is why it reaches the scalp and the spike does not.
The exception that proves the rule is muscle. Muscle fibers fire action potentials too, but the muscle sits millimeters from the electrode rather than across the skull, motor units fire in sustained overlapping volleys rather than scattered single spikes, and the fibers are large and numerous. The result is electromyographic activity that is high in frequency and often large in amplitude, landing squarely on the beta and gamma bands a QEEG practitioner cares about. A jaw clench, a furrowed brow, or a tense neck produces fast, high-amplitude activity that an untrained eye reads as beta. The physiology of why muscle dominates the high frequencies belongs here; recognizing and clearing it on a real record is the work of The QEEG Field Guide and of Chapters 5 and 10. The same logic sorts the other intruders you will reject during artifact review: eye movements and blinks are large, slow, frontal deflections because the eyeball is a standing dipole that moves; the cardiac signal is heartbeat-locked because the heart is the body's largest electrical generator; line noise is a razor-sharp sixty-hertz (or fifty-hertz) spike because it is not biological at all. The scalp records whatever electrical or mechanical event is large enough and close enough to reach it, cerebral or not.
You can watch synchrony change in real time. With a client at rest, eyes closed, posterior alpha stands tall and steady. Ask them to open their eyes and do mental arithmetic and the alpha collapses into low-voltage faster activity. The number of neurons did not change in that second, and the cells did not power down. They got busier. What changed is synchrony: the engaged population desynchronized, and the currents that had been adding began to cancel. This is event-related desynchronization, paired with its opposite, event-related synchronization, when an idling region falls back into a common rhythm and amplitude grows (Pfurtscheller & Lopes da Silva, 1999). It is the cleanest demonstration that amplitude tracks synchrony, and it is the reason a QEEG practitioner reads a flattening rhythm as a region coordinating less (usually doing more) rather than as a region doing less.
There is also a resonance aspect, and it is why the EEG has bands at all. A resonant system prefers certain frequencies, the way a struck bell rings at its own pitch or a swing answers best to a push at its natural period. Neural circuits resonate for concrete physical reasons: the membrane time constants of the cells, the conduction and synaptic delays around a loop, and the timing of inhibition all set a preferred rhythm. The thalamocortical loop (Chapter 3) resonates in the alpha range; networks of fast inhibitory interneurons resonate in the gamma range. The bands you name on a database comparison, delta through gamma, are not arbitrary slices of a continuum; they are the frequencies at which the brain's circuits most naturally resonate. Synchrony is the cortex falling into step; resonance is why it falls into step at these particular rates.
Two named phenomena from the classical thalamocortical literature appear on the IQCB blueprint and not in shorter neuroscience treatments. Both describe how rhythmic thalamic stimulation drives a building cortical response, and both are worth knowing because they are the experimental ancestors of the spontaneous spindle and the resonance idea above.
The recruiting response is what the cortex produces when the nonspecific (midline and intralaminar) thalamic nuclei are stimulated repetitively at a low rate, classically around six to twelve hertz. The cortical surface response is a slow, predominantly negative wave that is small on the first stimulus and grows over the next several, then wanes, a waxing-and-waning envelope that recruits more cortex into the response with each successive shock. The response is widespread across the cortical surface rather than confined to one primary area, because the nonspecific nuclei project diffusely. Recruiting responses were the early evidence that the thalamus can pace and progressively entrain large cortical territories, and they are the experimental cousin of the spontaneous sleep spindle, which the same diffuse machinery generates (Steriade, 2006; Niedermeyer & Lopes da Silva, 2005).
The augmenting response is the specific-pathway counterpart. When a specific (sensory relay) thalamic nucleus is stimulated repetitively, the response in its primary cortical target also grows over the first few stimuli, but it differs from the recruiting response in two ways the exam may test. It is focal rather than widespread, appearing over the primary cortex of that pathway rather than across the whole surface, and its waveform is initially surface-positive with a different laminar profile, reflecting activation that begins in the middle cortical layers where specific thalamic afferents terminate (Chapter 3), rather than the superficial-layer negativity of the recruiting response. The shared feature, an incrementing response over successive stimuli, is what both names capture; the distinction is specific-and-focal-and-positive (augmenting) versus nonspecific-and-diffuse-and-negative (recruiting) (Steriade, 2006; Niedermeyer & Lopes da Silva, 2005).
For a QEEG practitioner the value is conceptual rather than procedural, since neither response is something you elicit at the cap. They establish that the thalamus drives cortical rhythm, that specific and nonspecific thalamic systems engage different cortical layers and produce different surface signatures, and that an oscillation can build through progressive recruitment, which is exactly the spindle-generating behavior you will read about as the thalamocortical engine in the next chapter.
Inhibition is not one thing. The IQCB blueprint distinguishes two circuit motifs by name, and they shape rhythm and gain in different ways.
Recurrent inhibition (also called feedback inhibition) is the motif in which an excitatory cell, when it fires, drives an inhibitory interneuron that turns around and inhibits the same cell or its near neighbors. The classical spinal example is the Renshaw cell, which a motor neuron's own axon collateral excites and which then inhibits that motor neuron, damping its output. The cortex runs the same logic with its inhibitory interneurons: a population of pyramidal cells fires, drives local interneurons, and those interneurons silence the population, which then recovers and fires again. That excitation-then-feedback-silencing cycle is a rhythm generator. When the interneurons are the fast parvalbumin type whose synapses land on the pyramidal soma and axon initial segment, the rebound cycle runs in the gamma range, which is why driving those cells directly generates gamma (Cardin et al., 2009; Sohal et al., 2009). Recurrent inhibition is, in short, much of what turns a continuously active population into a synchronized, readable rhythm.
Presynaptic inhibition is a different and more selective mechanism. Instead of hyperpolarizing the whole receiving cell, an axo-axonic synapse acts on the terminal of an incoming axon, reducing the neurotransmitter that terminal releases, often through GABA-B receptors. The effect is to turn down one specific input to a cell without changing the cell's overall excitability or its response to its other inputs. Where recurrent (postsynaptic) inhibition lowers the gain on the entire cell, presynaptic inhibition lowers the gain on a single line into it, a far more surgical form of control used to filter which signals a neuron attends to. For a QEEG practitioner the distinction reinforces a theme: inhibition is not merely a brake on activity but a timing-and-gain mechanism, and the net balance of excitation and inhibition that the scalp sums is shaped by both the broad postsynaptic kind and the selective presynaptic kind (Niedermeyer & Lopes da Silva, 2005).
The ongoing rhythm that scrolls across the screen is a QEEG practitioner's main subject, but the same cortex produces two other signals that some assessment platforms target directly, and the exam expects you to define them. Both arise from the same post-synaptic currents in the same aligned pyramidal cells. They are not separate phenomena. They are the edges of one signal.
Event-related potentials (ERPs) are responses time-locked to a discrete stimulus, a tone, a flashed target, a cue to respond. A single trial does not reveal one, because the response is buried in the larger ongoing rhythm. The solution is averaging: present the same stimulus many times, align the recording to each presentation, and average across trials. The ongoing activity, not time-locked to the stimulus, averages toward zero, while the time-locked response survives. The improvement scales with the square root of the trial count, which is why ERP work needs many clean repetitions and a cooperative subject. Several components carry standard names and meanings: the P300, a positive deflection roughly three hundred milliseconds after a meaningful or surprising stimulus, indexing attention allocation and stimulus-evaluation speed (it shrinks and slows when attentional resources are taxed, and its latency lengthens with normal aging and with conditions that slow processing; Katsanis et al., 1996); the N200, an earlier negative deflection tied to response inhibition and conflict detection; the contingent negative variation (CNV), a slow negativity that builds while a person waits for an expected imperative stimulus, indexing preparation and expectancy; and the mismatch negativity (MMN), generated when a regularity in a stream of stimuli is violated even without attention, which makes it a window onto the cortex's automatic model of the recent past (Näätänen et al., 2007). The clinically useful fact is that a resting EEG can look unremarkable while these task-evoked responses are clearly atypical, so a normal resting map does not, by itself, close a question about attention or processing speed.
Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are sustained shifts in baseline voltage that unfold over seconds, near the direct-current end of the spectrum. They track the overall excitability of the underlying cortex: a surface-negative shift reflects a population of cells moving collectively closer to firing threshold (raised excitability and readiness), a positive shift the opposite. Their generation follows the dipole logic above, a maintained version of the superficial current sink any excitatory input creates. Because the shift is sustained rather than oscillatory, it sits at the bottom of the frequency range, which is why recording it demands special, low-frequency-capable, often DC-coupled equipment, and why ordinary filtered EEG discards it. SCPs can anticipate events as well as follow them: a slow negative readiness potential builds over the motor areas before a self-initiated movement (Fumuro et al., 2013), and the contingent negative variation develops during expectant waiting. Because they index excitability so directly, SCPs are trainable, with the neural mechanisms and placebo-comparable designs examined directly (Gevensleben et al., 2014). Hold all three signals on one timeline: the spontaneous rhythms occupy the familiar bands, ERPs are brief stimulus-locked sequences extracted by averaging, and SCPs are seconds-long drifts. They differ in timing and extraction, not in origin (Cahn & Polich, 2013).
Everything to this point describes the source. A QEEG practitioner spends most of a career running the problem in reverse, inferring sources from scalp voltages, so it is worth stating the forward direction plainly, because the inverse problem (Chapter 10's source localization) is only tractable if you understand the forward one.
The forward model is the chain that carries a current from the cortex to the electrode. Start with a patch of aligned pyramidal cells receiving synchronized synaptic input. Their individual dipoles sum into an equivalent dipole layer, a sheet of oriented current across the active cortex. That current must reach the electrode through the tissues between, and as it passes it spreads. This spreading is volume conduction, and it has two consequences a practitioner lives with on every recording.
The first is attenuation. Most of the voltage is lost crossing the poorly conducting skull, which is why scalp EEG is measured in microvolts and why the same source recorded on the cortical surface would be far larger. The second, and more important for interpretation, is blur. A source under one electrode spreads to its neighbors, so a feature at one site is partly shared across nearby sites, and two distant electrodes can pick up the same deep source at once. The scalp potential is a smeared projection of the cortex, not a sharp photograph.
Geometry shapes what reaches the surface. At the crown of a gyrus the aligned dendrites point straight out toward the scalp, producing a radial dipole that an electrode directly above reads strongly. In the wall of a sulcus the same cells are tilted, so their dipoles point across the head, producing a tangential dipole that scalp electrodes and source-localization methods read differently, and that a single overlying electrode may barely see. Since much of the cortex is folded into sulci, a large fraction of the generators are tangential and partly hidden, which is one concrete reason a scalp site names a neighborhood of cortex, much of it folded out of direct view, rather than a single point under the sensor.
Two practical lessons fall directly out of the forward model, and both return in later chapters. Volume conduction is why some apparent coherence between two sites (Chapter 4) is one source smeared across both rather than genuine communication, which is why phase-lag measures that discount zero-lag coupling matter. And the smear is why source-localization methods such as LORETA (Chapter 10) are estimates that work backward from the surface under explicit assumptions, not direct images of the active tissue. The forward model is solvable in principle from a known source; the inverse is underdetermined, and respecting that asymmetry is part of reading a source map honestly.
When you read a brain map, you are reading the summed, changing voltage of countless tiny cellular batteries, filtered through a short chain of facts the IQCB exam expects you to hold cold. The resting membrane potential is a permeability-weighted average dominated by potassium, held by an ATP-driven pump, and its failure is why a compromised brain slows. Post-synaptic potentials, not action potentials, are what reach the scalp, because they last long enough and line up well enough to summate, while spikes are too brief, too asynchronous, and too closed-field to register (the exception being muscle, which is close, sustained, and large). The pyramidal-cell dipole and open-field geometry are why the cortex broadcasts and most subcortex does not, and amplitude is synchrony seen through geometry rather than firing rate or effort. Synchrony sets amplitude and resonance sets the bands. Recruiting and augmenting responses are the classical evidence that the thalamus drives and progressively recruits cortical rhythm, the nonspecific pathway producing a diffuse surface-negative recruiting response and the specific pathway a focal augmenting one. Recurrent inhibition is the feedback motif (Renshaw-type) that turns activity into rhythm, and presynaptic inhibition is the selective axo-axonic gain control on a single input. ERPs are extracted by time-locked averaging (P300 for attention and evaluation speed, N200 for response inhibition, CNV for expectancy, MMN for automatic deviance detection), and SCPs are seconds-long DC shifts that index excitability and are trainable. The forward model carries a dipole layer to the electrode through volume conduction, which attenuates and blurs, sets radial against tangential sources, and makes the inverse problem you will run at the map an estimate rather than a photograph.
Every one of these is one mechanism applied again and again. The next chapter takes the tissue that generates the signal, the layered, columnar cortex and the subcortical structures that pace it, and turns the bioelectric source into a functional map you can read at a site.